Artículo

Ontoteleological Constitution of Entrepreneurship

Diego Boava, Fernanda Macedo, Natalia Macedo, Iaísa Helena Magalhães

Abstract


Entrepreneurship is a pluri-disciplinary phenomenon, object of research in several areas of knowledge. However, studies on this theme present approaches that start to consider entrepreneurship as a field of private knowledge in the phase of epistemological construction. In this context, the aim of this investigation is to contribute to the discussions on the theme, through studies on the ontoteleological constitution of entrepreneurship, in propaedeutic character, deflagrating new approaches. Thus, there is a presentation concerning the study of entrepreneurship, which may emphasize its ontical and ontological aspects. In addition, the reason why it is complex to define entrepreneurship is investigated. Subjects regarding the philosophy of entrepreneurship are introduced, seeking to present the bases for an ontoteleological approach to the phenomenon. Such an approach assumes that the finality of the entrepreneurial act relates to the main principles and transformations required into the organization. Finally, it is concluded that man is an entrepreneurial being, the meta-entrepreneur, and his entrepreneurial actions are not determined by external factors, but rather by the condition of his potentiality.

Keywords


Entrepreneurship; Meta-entrepreneurship; Transdiciplinarity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berglund, H. (2007). Researching entrepreneurship as lived experience. Handbook of qualitative research methods in entrepreneurship, 75-93.

Bittar, E.C.B, Almeida, G.A. (2001). Curso de filosofia do direito. São Paulo, Brazil: Atlas.

Bjerke, B. (2000). Understanding entrepreneurship: a new direction in research? In ICSB World Conference (pp. 7-10).

Boava, D.LT. (2006). Estudo sobre a dimensão ontológica do empreendedorismo (master’s thesis), Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Brazil.

Burrell, G., Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. London: Heinemann.

Busenitz, L. W., West III, G. P., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., and Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: past trends and future directions. Journal of management, 29(3), 285-308.

Bygrave, W.D., and Hofer, C.W. (1991). Theorizing about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 16(2), 13-22.

Carvalho, J.L.F., and Vergara, S.C. (2002). A fenomenologia e a pesquisa dos espaços de serviços. Revista de administração de empresas, 42(3), 1-14.

Chauí, M. (2002). Convite à filosofia. São Paulo, Brazil: Ática.

Cope, J. (2005). Researching entrepreneurship through phenomenological inquiry: philosophical and methodological issues. International Small Business Journal, 23(2), 163-189.

Davidsson, P. (1991). Continued entrepreneurship: Ability, need, and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth. Journal of business venturing, 6(6), 405-429.

Davidsson, P., and Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 25(4), 81-100.

Ehrich, L. (2005). Revisiting phenomenology: it’s potential for management research. In Proceedings challenges or organisations in global markets. British academy of management conference. Said Business School, Oxford University.

Filion, L.J. (1997). From entrepreneurship to entreprenology. In USASBE annual national conference entrepreneurship Proceedings, Winsonsin, USA.

Gama, R. (1985a). A tecnologia eo trabalho na história. Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil.

Gama, R. (1985b). História da técnica e da tecnologia: textos básicos. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.

Gama, R. (1992). Ciência e Técnica: antologia de textos históricos. São Paulo, Brazil: TA Queiroz.

Gibson, S.K., and Hanes, L.A. (2003). The contribution of phenomenology to HRD research. Human Resource Development Review, 2(2), 181-205.

Gil, A.C. (2003). O método fenomenológico na pesquisa em administração. Caderno de Pesquisa Pós-Graduação Imes, São Caetano do Sul, 4(8), 33-42.

Heidegger, M. (1999) Ser e tempo. Petrópolis, Brazil: Vozes.

Laverde, F.P. (2004) Análisis bibliométrico del campo del espíritu emprendedor latinoamericano a partir de los congresos latinoamericanos de espíritu empresarial del CDEE-ICESI. In III CIPEAL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1994). Fenomenologia da percepção. São Paulo, Brazil: Martins Fontes.

Miranda, A.L. (2002). Da natureza da tecnologia: uma análise filosófica sobre as dimensões ontológica, epistemológica e axiológica da tecnologia moderna (mater’s thesis). Curitiba, Brazil: Biblioteca do Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica do Paraná.

Moreira, D.A. (2004). Pesquisa em administração: origens, usos e

variantes do método fenomenológico. RAI: Revista de Administração e Inovação, 1(1), 5-19.

Sanders, P. (1982). Phenomenology: A new way of viewing organizational research. Academy of management review, 7(3), 353-360.

Sartre, J.P. (1966). L'existentialisme est un humanisme. Paris: Nagel.

Thiry-Cherques, H.R., Vieira, M., and Zouan, D. (2004). Programa para aplicação às ciências da gestão de um método de caráter fenomenológico. Pesquisa qualitativa em Administração. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Fundação Getúlio Vargas.

Vargas, M. (1985). Metodologia da pesquisa tecnológica. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Globo.

Vargas, M. (1994). Para uma filosofia da tecnologia. São Paulo, Brazil: Alfa Ômega.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Catalogs and Indexes:

       IndexCopernicus

Plagiarism analysis by: